Difference between revisions of "Cognitive Regime Shift I - When the Brain Breaks/"Prion dynamics and latency""
|(10 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)|
|Line 1:||Line 1:|
|Start time=July 23, 2018
|Start time=July 23, 2018 ::00
|End time=July 23, 2018
|End time=July 23, 2018 ::00 PM
Latest revision as of 22:21, January 20, 2019
July 23, 2018
1:30 pm - 2:20 pm
David Krakauer (SFI)
A large number of neurodegenerative diseases feature the accumulation of mis-folded proteins. These include prion diseases, Alzheimer’s disease, Parkinson’s disease, and Huntington’s disease. In all of these cases several different scales of organization are associated with disease progression or onset to include genetic, epigenetic, neural circuits, brain modules, and behavior. How should we best integrate data from each of these levels and what models and theories allow us to span levels? I shall discuss a few dynamical models of polymerization, protein accumulation, and protein diffusion through neural connections, that provide insights into disease progression at a number of different time and space scales. An ongoing challenge is a criterion for fixing thresholds that define an observable cognitive regime shift.
- Presentation file(s)
- Related files
David Krakauer (SFI) Link to the source page
A number of critical questions were raised about the best levels at which to establish causality when it comes to understanding both natural and disease-related aging. Namely what are the best observables to consider? Should these be single measurements or network based measurements. Could the best indicators involve comparisons across genetic and cognitive networks applying similar methods, or as is more typical time-dependent changes in a given network at one level of analysis. A recurring question was the relationship between energy and information and how their reciprocal dependencies change over the course of time and the course of disease.
Some very general issues that arose in conversation that require further exploration include:
- Approaching disease from a first-principles theoretical perspective - as is common in ecology - thus establishing principled data collection objectives (this would require a rigorous operational definition of the disease state in formal terms)
- The value and limitation of the current inductive, big data approach, that focuses on time-dependent associations
- The meaning of cognitive reserve, exercise or error correction, and the limits to these
- How adaptive phenomena that are ongoing mitigate the disease state or at some point perhaps accelerate it.
- How we might better explore causality in large systems with extensive non-linear feedback mechanisms.