Edit Reference Material: Network measures predict neuropsychological outcome after brain injury

You do not have permission to edit this page, for the following reason:

The action you have requested is limited to users in the group: Users.

To protect the wiki against automated edit spam, we kindly ask you to solve the following CAPTCHA:

Added by Meeting attendee[edit | edit source]

Fill out this field only for a reference material added by a meeting attendee. If left blank, the reference added will display under "General Meeting Reference Materials:

Document lookup[edit | edit source]

Use this field to search for a document based on a title or author name. If a match is found, the ID will be filled in automatically and the remaining fields will be automatically found by the wiki.

Document title (begin typing to search):
Document ID (for internal use):
Category:
Application area:

Keywords:
~~Related files (for open-source references only)~~ (deprecated - click the file button after creating this page):
Related videos (most major video services are supported - enter full video URLs here, with one URL per line):

**Fields that you can overwrite**
authors:
primary author last name:
type:
year:
source:
issn:
sgr:
doi:
isbn:
pmid:
arxiv:
scopus:
pui:
abstract:	Hubs are network components that hold positions of high importance for network function. Previous research has identified hubs in human brain networks derived from neuroimaging data; however, there is little consensus on the localization of such hubs. Moreover, direct evidence regarding the role of various proposed hubs in network function (e.g., cognition) is scarce. Regions of the default mode network (DMN) have been frequently identified as "cortical hubs" of brain networks. On theoretical grounds, we have argued against some of the methods used to identify these hubs and have advocated alternative approaches that identify different regions of cortex as hubs. Our framework predicts that our proposed hub locations may play influential roles in multiple aspects of cognition, and, in contrast, that hubs identified via other methods (including salient regions in the DMN) might not exert such broad influence. Here we used a neuropsychological approach to directly test these predictions by studying long-term cognitive and behavioral outcomes in 30 patients, 19 with focal lesions to six "target" hubs identified by our approaches (high system density and participation coefficient) and 11 with focal lesions to two "control" hubs (high degree centrality). In support of our predictions, we found that damage to target locations produced severe and widespread cognitive deficits, whereas damage to control locations produced more circumscribed deficits. These findings support our interpretation of how neuroimaging-derived network measures relate to cognition and augment classic neuroanatomically based predictions about cognitive and behavioral outcomes after focal brain injury.
Mendeley link:
month:
day:
date published:
revision:
pages:
volume:
issue:
websites:
publisher:
city:
editions:
institution:
series:
chapter:
language:
genre:
country:
department:

This is a minor edit Watch this page

Cancel

Santa Fe Institute Collaboration Platform

COMPLEX TIME: Adaptation, Aging, & Arrow of Time

Edit Reference Material: Network measures predict neuropsychological outcome after brain injury

Added by Meeting attendee[edit | edit source]

Document lookup[edit | edit source]