Santa Fe Institute Collaboration Platform

COMPLEX TIME: Adaptation, Aging, & Arrow of Time

Get Involved!
Contact: Caitlin Lorraine McShea, Program Manager, cmcshea@santafe.edu

Difference between revisions of "Population and the Environment: Analytical Demography and Applied Population Ethics/Foundation of population ethics - population axiology & moral theory"

From Complex Time
Line 13: Line 13:
 
|Reference material notes=Hilary Greaves. Population Axiology.  Philosophy Compass. (2017). A nice summary of some of the core issues in population axiology.
 
|Reference material notes=Hilary Greaves. Population Axiology.  Philosophy Compass. (2017). A nice summary of some of the core issues in population axiology.
  
Mike Huemer. IN Defense of Repugnance. Mind (2007). A more in-depth discussion of one of the controversial views in population axiology.
+
Mike Huemer. In Defense of Repugnance. Mind (2007). A more in-depth discussion of one of the controversial views in population axiology.
 
}}
 
}}

Revision as of 18:09, October 14, 2018

October 13, 2018
9:30 am - 9:45 am

Presenter

Christopher Cowie (Durham Univ.)

Abstract

How should we compare states of affairs that differ in not only the identities and qualities of life of those who comprise them, but also in their populations? This is the central challenge for moral philosophers working on population and future generations. I introduce the key ideas and arguments. I focus on the ‘repugnant conclusion’: the view that large populations of people with relatively low qualities of life may be better than small populations with relatively higher quality of life. I explore some of the arguments for and against this view and sketch the range of positions that those who wish to avoid it have adopted.    

Presentation file(s)
Related files