To protect the wiki against automated edit spam, we kindly ask you to solve the following CAPTCHA:
Post-meeting summary (one paragraph)
Additional post-meeting information
Important: None of the below information will be displayed unless the Post-meeting summary is filled out above.
Short, non-technical answers to the following questions:
|What was the big question or idea the meeting was designed to explore (~15 words)?
|What was the goal of the meeting (~15 words)?
|What was the single most important outcome of the meeting (~15 words)?
|What disciplines/fields were represented at the meeting?
|What one or two new research direction(s) did the meeting suggest?
|What was the most interesting thing said during the meeting, and who said it?
|What idea from the meeting is likely to be most impactful for science?
|What idea from the meeting is potentially translatable into an application—i.e., something useful to businesses, policy makers, government agencies, or other non-academic audiences?
|What new method/technology/algorithm/etc. resulted (or may result) from this meeting?
A narrative summary of the meeting (1-3 pages)
This can be partially based on the WSWG proposal you originally submitted but should reflect how the meeting actually went; include any notable feedback you received from participants; please also note what worked well and what could have been improved.
A concise description of outcomes that might emerge from the meeting
e.g., new perspectives/questions/theory, new methods/algorithms/data, new projects/collaborations, future meetings, manuscripts, grant proposals, etc.
e.g., in particular, any piece written for the SFI Update—contact John German for text