Santa Fe Institute Collaboration Platform

COMPLEX TIME: Adaptation, Aging, & Arrow of Time

Get Involved!
Contact: Amy P. Chen, Program Manager, amypchen@santafe.edu

Universally sloppy parameter sensitivities in systems biology models

From Complex Time
Revision as of 22:39, January 30, 2019 by RobertMarsland (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{Reference Material |Meeting=Irreversible Processes in Ecological Evolution |Added by=RobertMarsland |title=Universally sloppy parameter sensitivities in systems biology mode...")

(diff) ← Older revision | Approved revision (diff) | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Category
General Reference
author-supplied keywords
keywords
authors
Ryan N. Gutenkunst
Joshua J. Waterfall
Fergal P. Casey
Kevin S. Brown
Christopher R. Myers
James P. Sethna
title
Universally sloppy parameter sensitivities in systems biology models
type
journal
year
2007
source
PLoS Computational Biology
pages
1871-1878
volume
3
issue
10
link
https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/6b8c9643-c3fe-3b46-be17-1e556ed796e7/(Error!"Error!" is not a number.)

Abstract

Quantitative computational models play an increasingly important role in modern biology. Such models typically involve many free parameters, and assigning their values is often a substantial obstacle to model development. Directly measuring in vivo biochemical parameters is difficult, and collectively fitting them to other experimental data often yields large parameter uncertainties. Nevertheless, in earlier work we showed in a growth-factor-signaling model that collective fitting could yield well-constrained predictions, even when it left individual parameters very poorly constrained. We also showed that the model had a "sloppy" spectrum of parameter sensitivities, with eigenvalues roughly evenly distributed over many decades. Here we use a collection of models from the literature to test whether such sloppy spectra are common in systems biology. Strikingly, we find that every model we examine has a sloppy spectrum of sensitivities. We also test several consequences of this sloppiness for building predictive models. In particular, sloppiness suggests that collective fits to even large amounts of ideal time-series data will often leave many parameters poorly constrained. Tests over our model collection are consistent with this suggestion. This difficulty with collective fits may seem to argue for direct parameter measurements, but sloppiness also implies that such measurements must be formidably precise and complete to usefully constrain many model predictions. We confirm this implication in our growth-factor-signaling model. Our results suggest that sloppy sensitivity spectra are universal in systems biology models. The prevalence of sloppiness highlights the power of collective fits and suggests that modelers should focus on predictions rather than on parameters.

Counts

Citation count From Scopus. Refreshed every 5 days.
682
Page views
6Error!"Error!" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 6.

Identifiers

  • doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.0030189 (Google search)
  • issn: 1553734X
  • sgr: 35748977901
  • isbn: 1553-734X
  • pmid: 17922568
  • arxiv: q-bio/0701039
  • scopus: 2-s2.0-35748977901
  • pui: 350043403

Add a file