Edit Meeting: Dynamic Multi-System Resilience in Human Aging

You do not have permission to edit this page, for the following reason:

The action you have requested is limited to users in the group: Users.

To protect the wiki against automated edit spam, we kindly ask you to solve the following CAPTCHA:

Category*:
Application area:
Start date/time*:
End date/time:
Meeting videos (enter a YouTube URL - one URL per line):	https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rereXL_LL9w&list=PLZlVBTf7N6GoAPu-80tFHGLD39e3uidj3&index=4
Organizers (automatically sorted by last name):
Meeting Synopsis:	The Dynamic Multi-System Resilience in Human Aging Working Group planned under the Adaptation, Aging, Arrow of Time program aims to improve understanding of the aging-related human potential to withstand, and to recover from, stressors and diseases. Over the last decades much has been learned on different ‘omics-fields’ of aging, on physical frailty, and psychosocial adaptation in aging, but now it is time to put together again the aging individual. Therefore we will focus on the aging related changes in dynamic multi-system resilience and relate this to what is known of changes in subsystem (organ based) resilience over time. Scientists from medicine, ecology, physics, mathematics, computational sciences and complexity science will interact to theoretically, methodologically and empirically push the clinically highly relevant theme of ‘Resilience in Human Aging’ a big step forward.
Additional pre-meeting info:	'''MEETING PREPARATION ''' In preparation for the meeting, we ask all participants to read the following straw man paper which will be used to anchor the discussions during the meeting:-Olde Rikkert M.G. & Melis R.J.F, “Rerouting Geriatric Medicine by Complementing Static Frailty Measures with Dynamic resilience Indicators of Recovery Potential” ''currently under review in Frontiers''. '''PRESENTATION INSTRUCTIONS''' 20 minute presentation designed for a multidisciplinary audience on respective state-of-art of fields. 5-15 slides which: <div><ul><li>introduce the topic, highlighting recent state of the art at a high level</li><li>identify current challenges with potential for transformative breakthroughs.</li></ul></div>'''ANTICIPATED WORKING GROUP OUTCOME''' <div><ul><li>- Inspire interdisciplinary exchanges that can fuel participants’ future research</li><li>- A collaborative volume published through the SFI Press: 10 short paper, 1500 words each</li><li>- Elaborate and build on the straw man paper (Olde RIkkert & Melis, under review in Frontiers)</li><li>- Build a collaborative network for future research projects</li></ul></div>
Location:
Location link (to make the location text a hyperlink to a web site):
Links:
Links to Reference Materials:
Attendee list (automatically sorted by last name):
Student list:

Post-meeting information

Post-meeting summary (one paragraph)

Coming soon.

Additional post-meeting information

Important: None of the below information will be displayed unless the Post-meeting summary is filled out above.

Questions

Short, non-technical answers to the following questions:

What was the big question or idea the meeting was designed to explore (~15 words)?
What was the goal of the meeting (~15 words)?
What was the single most important outcome of the meeting (~15 words)?
What disciplines/fields were represented at the meeting?
What one or two new research direction(s) did the meeting suggest?
What was the most interesting thing said during the meeting, and who said it?
What idea from the meeting is likely to be most impactful for science?
What idea from the meeting is potentially translatable into an application—i.e., something useful to businesses, policy makers, government agencies, or other non-academic audiences?
What new method/technology/algorithm/etc. resulted (or may result) from this meeting?

A narrative summary of the meeting (1-3 pages)

This can be partially based on the WSWG proposal you originally submitted but should reflect how the meeting actually went; include any notable feedback you received from participants; please also note what worked well and what could have been improved.

A concise description of outcomes that might emerge from the meeting

e.g., new perspectives/questions/theory, new methods/algorithms/data, new projects/collaborations, future meetings, manuscripts, grant proposals, etc.

Any communication produced related to the meeting

e.g., in particular, any piece written for the SFI Update—contact John German for text

This is a minor edit Watch this page

Cancel

Santa Fe Institute Collaboration Platform

COMPLEX TIME: Adaptation, Aging, & Arrow of Time