Santa Fe Institute Collaboration Platform

COMPLEX TIME: Adaptation, Aging, & Arrow of Time

Get Involved!
Contact: Caitlin Lorraine McShea, Program Manager, cmcshea@santafe.edu

Edit Meeting: Dynamic Multi-System Resilience in Human Aging

From Complex Time

You do not have permission to edit this page, for the following reason:

The action you have requested is limited to users in the group: Users.


To protect the wiki against automated edit spam, we kindly ask you to solve the following CAPTCHA:

Category*:
Application area:
Start date/time*:
End date/time:
Meeting videos (enter a YouTube URL - one URL per line):
Organizers (automatically sorted by last name):
Meeting Synopsis:
Additional pre-meeting info:
Location:
Location link (to make the location text a hyperlink to a web site):
Links:
Links to Reference Materials:
Attendee list (automatically sorted by last name):
Student list:

Post-meeting information

Post-meeting summary (one paragraph)

Additional post-meeting information

Important: None of the below information will be displayed unless the Post-meeting summary is filled out above.

Questions

Short, non-technical answers to the following questions:

What was the big question or idea the meeting was designed to explore (~15 words)?
What was the goal of the meeting (~15 words)?
What was the single most important outcome of the meeting (~15 words)?
What disciplines/fields were represented at the meeting?
What one or two new research direction(s) did the meeting suggest?
What was the most interesting thing said during the meeting, and who said it?
What idea from the meeting is likely to be most impactful for science?
What idea from the meeting is potentially translatable into an application—i.e., something useful to businesses, policy makers, government agencies, or other non-academic audiences?
What new method/technology/algorithm/etc. resulted (or may result) from this meeting?

A narrative summary of the meeting (1-3 pages)

This can be partially based on the WSWG proposal you originally submitted but should reflect how the meeting actually went; include any notable feedback you received from participants; please also note what worked well and what could have been improved.

A concise description of outcomes that might emerge from the meeting

e.g., new perspectives/questions/theory, new methods/algorithms/data, new projects/collaborations, future meetings, manuscripts, grant proposals, etc.

Any communication produced related to the meeting

e.g., in particular, any piece written for the SFI Update—contact John German for text

Cancel